Structuration theory is a concept in sociology that offers perspectives on human behavior based on a synthesis of structure and agency effects known as the “duality of structure.”
Instead of describing the capacity of human action as being constrained by powerful stable societal structures (such as educational, religious, or political institutions) or as a function of the individual expression of will (i.e., agency), structuration theory acknowledges the interaction of meaning, standards and values, and power and posits a dynamic relationship between these different facets of concept in sociology.
The nexus of structure and agency has been a central tenet in the field of sociology since its inception. Theories that argue for the preeminence of structure resolve that the behavior of individuals is largely determined by their socialization into that structure.
Social structures are viewed as products of individual action that are sustaining or discarded, rather than as incommensurable forces.
Interaction Theory
Social interaction is a face-to-face process that consists of actions, reactions, and mutual edition between two or greater individuals.
The aim of social interaction is to talk with others. Social interaction consists of all language, which includes frame language and mannerisms. Erving Goffman, one of the forefathers of this theoretical perspective, emphasized the significance of managing in social interactions. Consistent with Goffman, at some point of an interplay. People will try to manipulate the conduct of the opposite individuals. Which will attain wanted facts, and that allows you to manage the notion of 1’s own picture.
If the interaction is in danger of finishing before a person wants it to. It may conserve through several steps. One conversational companion can agree to the expectancies of the opposite. He or she can forget about positive incidents, or he or she can clear up obvious issues.
0 responses on "Structuration theory Vs. Interaction Theory & Benefits For Revision"